I really don't get this one. In a piece appearing to announce the grudging "acceptance" of blogs at Christianity Today, author Ted Olsen insults current bloggers, while expressing his ignorance of the form. He's apparently relying on some four-year-old information, which makes no sense in the blogsphere, since so much has changed. Claiming that there's nothing much worthwhile at Blogs4God (could he have possibly looked at all 969 blogs?) makes me wonder if he's only trying to make everybody else look bad so he won't have to work so hard, or something. ?????
I wish I knew what criteria he used to determine the "worth" of a blog.